PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DIRECT INSTRUCTION BERBANTU VIDEO PERGERAKAN PROTOZOA TERHADAP HASIL TES SISWA KELAS X IPA 3 SMA NEGERI 3 JEMBER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/alveoli.v2i1.37Keywords:
direct instruction, protozoa movement video, testAbstract
Direct Instruction is a learning model based on explicit instruction, ongoing support, and student involvement that is compatible with technology-based teaching. One of the direct instruction designs is assisted by video-based on evidence because of effectively and easily reached. This study aimed to describe the effect of direct instruction assisted protozoa movement video on test results. The sample of this study was 33 respondents from students of X IPA 3 class in SMA Negeri 3 Jember. The type of this study was pre-experimental designs (one-group pretest-posttest design). Data were obtained by pretest and posttest, then descriptively analyzed by R version 4.0.5. This study resulted a minimum score (1) and a maximum score (5) of pretest, a minimum score (4) and a maximum score (5) of posttests, and an average pretest score (3.30) and posttest (4.88). The conclusion of this study was the direct instruction assisted protozoa movement video had improved student test results.
Keyword: direct instruction, protozoa movement video, test
Direct Instruction merupakan model pembelajaran berbasis instruksi eksplisit, dukungan berkelanjutan, dan keterlibatan siswa yang sesuai dengan pengajaran berbasis teknologi. Salah satu rancangan model pembelajaran direct instruction ialah berbantu video yang berbasis bukti, karena efektif dan mudah dijangkau. Tujuan penelitian ini ialah mendeskripsikan pengaruh model pembelajaran direct instruction berbantu video pergerakan protozoa terhadap hasil tes. Sampel penelitian ini berjumlah 33 responden dari siswa kelas X IPA 3 SMA Negeri 3 Jember. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan berupa pre-experimental designs (one-group pretest-posttest design). Data didapatkan melalui instrumen pretest dan posttest, kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif dengan aplikasi R versi 4.0.5. Penelitian ini menghasilkan skor minimal (1) dan skor maksimal (5) pretest, skor minimal (4) dan skor maksimal (5) posttest, dan rata-rata skor pretest (3,30) dan posttest (4,88). Kesimpulan penelitian ini ialah model pembelajaran direct instruction berbantu video pergerakan protozoa meningkatkan hasil tes siswa.
Kata Kunci: direct instruction, tes, video pergerakan protozoa
References
Al Maliki IM, Doyan A, dan ‘Ardhuha J. “Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Direct Instruction Berbantuan Media Animasi terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Batu Layar.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika “Lensa”. 2. No 1 (2014): 188-172. doi: 10.33394/j-lkf.v2i1.306.
Arianti BI, Sahidu H, Harjono A, dan Gunawan. “Pengaruh Model Direct Instruction Berban-tuan Simulasi Virtual terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Siswa.” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi. 2. No 4 (2016): 159-163. doi: 10.29303/jpft.v2i4.307.
Brame CJ. “Effective Educational Videos: Principles and Guidelines for Maximizing Student Learning from Video Content.” CBE-Life Sciences Education. 15. No. 6 (2016): 1-6. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125.
Budiyanto AK. 2016. Sintaks 45 Model Pembelajaran dalam Student Centered Learning (CTL). Malang: UMM Press.
Daryanto. 2013. Strategi dan Tahapan Mengajar (Bekal Keterampilan Dasar Bagi Guru). Bandung: CV Yrama Widya.
Dash S, Kamath U, Rao G, Prakash J, and Mishra S. “Audio Visual Aid in Teaching ‘Fatty Liver’.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 44 No. 3 (2015): 241–245. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20935.
Dharmayani NKY, Natajaya IN, dan Divayana DGH. “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Direct Instruction Berbantuan Video dan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru terhadap Hasil Belajar Rias Kreatif Siswa Kelas XI Tata Kecantikan Kulit SMK Negeri 2 Singaraja”. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Indonesia 10 No. 1 (2019): 45-55. doi: 10.23887/japi.v10i1.2789.
Engelmann S. 1980. Direct instruction. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Educational Techno-logy.
Ewing B. “Direct Instruction in Mathematics: Issues for Schools with High Indigenous Enro-lments: A Literature Review.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 36 No 5 (2011): 56-91.
Greenberg AD, and Zanetis J. 2012. The Impact of Broadcast and Streaming Video in Educa-tion. U.S. and other countries: Portion Cisco Systems Inc. and portion Wainhouse Re-search, LLC. All rights reserved.
Jenni B. “Trypanosoma”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9va64T8H2s [diunggah pada 21 Juni 2012].
Liem GAD, dan Martin AJ. Direct Instruction and Academic Achievement. In International Guide to Student Achievement, by J. Hattie & E. Anderman (Eds.). Oxford: Routledge. 2013.
Loreti T/Kemp M. “Amoeba Eats Paramecia (Amoeba's Lunch) [Amoeba Endocyto-sis/Phagocytosis Part 1].” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mv6Ehv06mXY [diung-gah pada 25 Mei 2016].
Magliaro SG, Lockee BB, and Burton JK. “Direct Instruction Revisited: A Key Model for Instructional Technology”. ETR&D. 53. No 4 (2005): 41–55. doi: 10.1007/BF02504684.
Marlina, dan Marwan H. “Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pengajaran Langsung (Direct Instruc-tion) terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X MAN Peudada pada Materi Kebutuhan Ma-nusia”. Jurnal Sains Ekonomi dan Edukasi 3 No. 1 (2015): 1-10.
Nuraini F, ‘Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Langsung (Direct Instruction) dan Model Pembe-lajaran Kooperatif Teams Game Tournament (TGT) terhadap Peningkatan Motivasi Be-lajar dan Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Kelas X MIPA 1 dan Kelas X MIPA 2 SMA Negeri 1 Turi.’ Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. 2018.
Oka DN, Adi NNS, dan Marhaeni IGAND. “Pengaruh Pembelajaran IPA Berbantuan Video Edukasi terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP”. Suluh Pendidikan 16 No. 2 (2018): 113-119.
Prabowo SL, dan Nurmaliyah F. 2010. Perencanaan Pembelajaran Pada Bidang Studi, Bi-dang Studi Tematik, Muatan Lokal, Kecakapan Hidup, Bimbingan dan Konseling. Ma-lang: UIN-Maliki Press.
Smith C. “How a Paramecium Eats!” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sn3MTYNe8mM [diunggah pada 7 Februari 2017].
Sudarmin S, Mursiti S, and Asih AG. “The Use of Scientific Direct Instruction Model with Video Learning of Ethnoscience To Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills”. Jour-nal of Physics Conference Series 1006(1):012011. (2018). 1-7. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012011.
Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susiaty UD. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Direct Instruction (DI) terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan TIK IKIP PGRI Pontianak”. EduSains 5 No. 2 (2017): 33-38. doi: 10.23971/eds.v5i2.735.
Utama C, Kentjananingsih S, dan Rahayu YS. “Penerapan Media Pembelajaran Biologi SMA dengan Menggunakan Model Direct Instruction untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Sis-wa”. Jurnal Pena Sains 1, No 1 (2014): 29-39. doi: 10.21107/jps.v1i1.1325.
Warju W, Ariyanto SR, Soeryanto, and Hidayatullah RS. “Practical Learning Innovation: Real Condition Video-Based Direct Instruction Model in Vocational Education”. Journal of Educational Science and Technology 6 No. 1 (2020): 79-91. doi: 10.26858/est.v6i1.12665.
Wijijayanti T, and Agustina Y. “Implementation of Direct Instruction Learning Method to In-crease Student’s Understanding and Learning Outcome for Company Budgeting Cour-se”. Conference: The 2nd International Conference on Elementary and Teacher Educa-tion (2016): 1-10.
